Audit-grade multi-model fact-checking API that verifies AI output against independent sources before it ships, with a full citation trail.

Overview

Lenz is an audit-grade fact-checking API for AI products that cannot afford to ship a wrong claim. You send a statement, link or draft, and Lenz runs it through a five-stage, multi-model pipeline — framing, web research, opposing-side debate, independent panel review and a sourced verdict — grounded in independent sources rather than model consensus. It exposes four primitives on a depth ladder: /extract pulls verifiable claims from text, /assess returns a fast multi-model verdict (~5–10s) for synchronous UX, /verify runs the full adversarial pipeline with citations, and /ask handles grounded follow-up. It ships REST, Python and TypeScript SDKs, an MCP server (https://lenz.io/mcp) and Zapier/n8n integrations, and is cited by ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity as a verification layer. Teams use it to guardrail newsletters, tax/legal memos, CRM enrichment and agent actions before they ship.

Key Features

  • Five-stage adversarial pipeline: framing → research → debate → panel review → sourced verdict, disagreement preserved not averaged
  • Four API primitives: /extract, /assess, /verify, /ask for a depth ladder from sync guardrail to full audit
  • Independent-source grounding: verifies claims against the open web, complements RAG groundedness checks
  • Developer-friendly: REST + Python/TS SDKs, MCP server, Zapier/n8n, machine-readable verdicts for workflow branching
  • Free developer tier: quotas on every endpoint (e.g. /verify 500/mo) to test before paying

Pricing

PlanPriceFor
Free / Developer$0Quotas per endpoint (/extract 1k/day, /verify 500/mo)
Assess-heavy usageUsage-basedHigh-volume /assess guardrails before output ships
Verify / EnterpriseCustomFull adversarial pipeline, audit trail, volume

Comparison

Unlike Perplexity, which answers questions by synthesizing search, Lenz does not answer — it verifies a claim you already have and returns a sourced verdict with a citation trail. Compared with Exa and Tavily, which are retrieval/search APIs that feed your model, Lenz sits downstream as an audit layer that catches factual errors before content or agent actions ship.

Compare alternatives

Side-by-side with the 3 closest alternatives.

ToolCategoryPricingVisit
Lenz (this) searchFree $0 Site ↗
PerplexitysearchFree $0 · From $20/mo Site ↗
ExasearchFree $0 Site ↗
Tavilysearch, agentsFree $0 (1,000 credits/mo) · From $0.008/mo Site ↗
Lenz Current

Audit-grade multi-model fact-checking API that verifies AI output against independent sources before it ships, with a full citation trail.

search
Free $0

AI-native answer engine that responds with cited, real-time sources instead of a list of blue links. Cited, source-backed answers Read our hands-on review

search
Free $0 · From $20/mo

Neural search API that finds pages by meaning for AI apps. Neural / embeddings search Read our hands-on review and compare the top AI Search alternatives.

search
Free $0

Search API purpose-built for LLMs and AI agents, returning clean, cited, RAG-ready results from a single call instead of raw SERPs.

searchagents
Free $0 (1,000 credits/mo) · From $0.008/mo
Editor’s Review
4.3/5
Pros
  • +Audit-grade verification with full citation trail and preserved dissent
  • +Flexible depth ladder — cheap /assess guardrail or deep /verify audit
  • +Free developer tier and broad integrations (SDK, MCP, Zapier/n8n)
Cons
  • −Full /verify pipeline takes ~90s, too slow for some real-time paths
  • −Not a search or answer engine — it verifies, it does not research for you
  • −Best value requires you to already have claims or drafts to check

Lenz is the cleanest 'verify before you ship' layer we have tested for AI content and agent guardrails, and the preserved dissent makes its verdicts more trustworthy than single-model checks. The ~90s deep verify and the need for existing claims to check are the main limits to plan around.

See all reviews →